[Dcmlib] Re: CREATIS CVS: gdcm jpr

[Mathieu Malaterre]

Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> 
>> You get an image, in which Public groups are explicitVR, and Shadow 
>> groups are ImplicitVR.
>> (We have tons of thoose images)
> 
> 
> Well I only need one example, I haven't seen any in gdcmData, so I am 
> just curious where you found it. Thanks for sending me a sample.

Sorry to send it to everybody, but just to keep reference. Yes indeed 
gdcm does not handle MetaHeader vs DataSet. There is only *ONE* case 
(as I said in a previous mail), where you can find both Explicit AND 
Implicit in the same DICOM file is when you have

"""
The MetaHeader (group 0002) in Explicit, and in (0002,0010) the TS sais 
the dataset in in Implicit (and therefore the DataSet is indeed in 
Implicit). This is the sole case ! No inhomogenous whatsoever.
"""

I consider this as a bad interpretation of the standard, and thus I 
would like -again- to move toward gdcm2, instead.

Thanks,
Mathieu