[Dcmlib] gdcm becoming too good ... or too bad ? : Image without Transfer Synatx

[Mathieu Malaterre]

Jean-Pierre Roux wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> 
>> I have purposely added an abort in gdcm code. Because I believe we 
>> will never ever find this case. Only gdcm is so broken that it allow 
>> reading DICOM file without Transfer Syntax.
> 
> 
> None of the ACR-NEMA file has a Transfer Syntax field.
> Our purpose was to read ACR-NEMA, as well (not only DICOM V3 images)
> When a file !IsDicomV3(), the pixels are considered to be a 'Raw State' 
> (uncompressed) :IsRaw = true, and everything goes on *normally*.
> 
> --> comment out the abort, on purpose.

Ok shame on me... I got confused with the TransferSyntax called: 
"Unknown Transfer Syntax".

Anyway I still don't understand why gdcm-bcc55 start failing on ACR-NEMA 
only 8days ago (did you see the NULL I added at the end of special 
transfer syntax). Are you sure nothing else change, because without 
NULL, we should have seen this bug a long time ago...

my 2 cents
Mathieu