[Rtk-users] Missing *.lib at compilation with ITK 5.3 and 5.4 ?

[Vincent Libertiaux]

Yes, I have the same. What puzzled me is that I already had the 
itkRTK-5.2 on top of the all the others.

If you can confirm this is the only one I need to link against in my 
GUI, I am all good !

Thank you again,

V.

On 07.12.23 11:27, Simon Rit wrote:
> Ok. On my Windows box which compiles RTK nightly with Ninja and MSVC 
> 2019, the libs are in the bin folder and called itkRTK-5.4.dll and 
> bin/itkCudaCommon-5.4.dll. Maybe the itk prefix is new?
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:23 AM Vincent Libertiaux <vl at xris.eu> wrote:
>
>     Hi Simon,
>
>     I tried on Windows 10 and 11, with Visual Studio 2019.
>
>     I compile ITK and RTK jointly, with the cuda option on. I tried
>     building both static and dynamic libraries and just static ones,
>     the result is the same.
>
>     I have no warning in CMAKE or in Visual Studio.
>
>     Thank you for your time,
>
>     V.
>
>     On 07.12.23 11:13, Simon Rit wrote:
>>     Hi,
>>     I'm not sure, I guess there is if you see a difference! Can you
>>     tell us more about the operating system and the compiler? Do you
>>     compile ITK first and then RTK or both jointly?
>>     Simon
>>
>>     On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vincent Libertiaux <vl at xris.eu>
>>     wrote:
>>
>>         Hello !
>>
>>         I have built a GUI around RTK with ITK 5.2 module and
>>         everything works
>>         fine.
>>
>>         I wanted to upgrade to ITK 5.3 ( I also tried with ITK 5.4
>>         with the same
>>         results) and for some reasons, not all the rtk*.lib (located
>>         in the
>>         Build/lib folder) are generated.  I only have 3 of them with
>>         the 5.3 and
>>         0 with the 5.4.  All my CMake options were the same than for the
>>         compilation of version 5.2, namely building shared and static
>>         libraries.
>>
>>         The applications (rtkfdk, rtkprojections,...) work fine.
>>
>>
>>         I looked into the CMakeLists files but couldn't really find
>>         any useful
>>         information.
>>
>>
>>         Is there any significant difference in the *lib generation
>>         after ITK v
>>         5.2 ??
>>
>>         I thank you in advance for any help you can provide !
>>
>>         Best regards,
>>
>>         Vincent
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Rtk-users mailing list
>>         rtk-users at openrtk.org
>>         https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Rtk-users mailing list
>     rtk-users at openrtk.org
>     https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/pipermail/rtk-users/attachments/20231207/ab295c0c/attachment.htm>