[Rtk-users] Missing *.lib at compilation with ITK 5.3 and 5.4 ?

[Simon Rit]

If you're using Cuda, you'll probably need itkCudaComon-5.4.dll too. But in
general, I think it's easier and safer to manage all this with CMake
following the FirstReconstruction example
<https://github.com/RTKConsortium/RTK/tree/master/examples/FirstReconstruction/>
.
Simon

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:34 AM Vincent Libertiaux <vl at xris.eu> wrote:

> Yes, I have the same. What puzzled me is that I already had the itkRTK-5.2
> on top of the all the others.
>
> If you can confirm this is the only one I need to link against in my GUI,
> I am all good !
>
> Thank you again,
>
> V.
> On 07.12.23 11:27, Simon Rit wrote:
>
> Ok. On my Windows box which compiles RTK nightly with Ninja and MSVC 2019,
> the libs are in the bin folder and called itkRTK-5.4.dll and
> bin/itkCudaCommon-5.4.dll. Maybe the itk prefix is new?
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:23 AM Vincent Libertiaux <vl at xris.eu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> I tried on Windows 10 and 11, with Visual Studio 2019.
>>
>> I compile ITK and RTK jointly, with the cuda option on.  I tried building
>> both static and dynamic libraries and just static ones, the result is the
>> same.
>>
>> I have no warning in CMAKE or in Visual Studio.
>>
>> Thank you for your time,
>>
>> V.
>> On 07.12.23 11:13, Simon Rit wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm not sure, I guess there is if you see a difference! Can you tell us
>> more about the operating system and the compiler? Do you compile ITK first
>> and then RTK or both jointly?
>> Simon
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vincent Libertiaux <vl at xris.eu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello !
>>>
>>> I have built a GUI around RTK with ITK 5.2 module and everything works
>>> fine.
>>>
>>> I wanted to upgrade to ITK 5.3 ( I also tried with ITK 5.4 with the same
>>> results) and for some reasons, not all the rtk*.lib (located in the
>>> Build/lib folder) are generated.  I only have 3 of them with the 5.3 and
>>> 0 with the 5.4.  All my CMake options were the same than for the
>>> compilation of version 5.2, namely building shared and static libraries.
>>>
>>> The applications (rtkfdk, rtkprojections,...) work fine.
>>>
>>>
>>> I looked into the CMakeLists files but couldn't really find any useful
>>> information.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there any significant difference in the *lib generation after ITK v
>>> 5.2 ??
>>>
>>> I thank you in advance for any help you can provide !
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Vincent
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rtk-users mailing list
>>> rtk-users at openrtk.org
>>> https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Rtk-users mailing list
>> rtk-users at openrtk.org
>> https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Rtk-users mailing list
> rtk-users at openrtk.org
> https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/pipermail/rtk-users/attachments/20231207/efdf5de3/attachment.htm>